Proposal: [BIP-841] Enable iUSD/aGHO Gauge on Balancer v3 Ethereum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support the addition of this gauge, as yield-bearing assets can drive protocol fees up.
Proposal: [BIP-842] Deploy kpk Sub-Roles architecture
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This is an operational vote to allow kpk to update their permissions and reduce governance workload. Support.
Proposal: [BIP-843] Balancer DAO Investment Policy Statement
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: A set of rules that will guide the DAO’s investments, managed by kpk. It is a great step for the DAO, as it makes everything predictable and transparent.
Proposal: [BIP-844] Grant ProtocolFeeController v2 Permissions to the Maxis Omni Multi-sig
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Proposal to grant permission to the Maxis to access the parameters needed in the relevant smart contracts. Support.
Proposal: [BIP-845] Grant Admin Permissions to Balancer v3 ReCLAMM pools
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Proposal to grant permission to the Maxis and the Emergency subDAO safe to access the parameters needed in the relevant smart contracts. Support.
Proposal: [BIP-846] Funding for the Balancer OpCo - Admin & Ops - Year 4
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support funding OpCo for the next term. The costs are on the low end, and they get the job done.
Proposal: [BIP-847] Fund OpCo Product team - Q3 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: The Product team has significantly improved the user experience, and the OKRs are solid.
Proposal: [BIP-848] Fund Beethoven X DAO - Technical for July - September 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Their technical support is crucial for moving things forward, and the objectives for the next quarter align with Balancer’s main goals.
Proposal: [BIP-849] Kill Stale Gauges Q2 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This removes gauges that do not receive any incentives for a long time.
Proposal: [BIP-850] DAO Treasury Assets Migration - Mainnet
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: A good move to increase the visibility of the assets held by the treasury and to kpk to get them to work.
Proposal: [BIP-851] Staking POL Tokens and Delegating to Balancer’s Governance Profile
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: It shows a commitment to Polygon governance.
Proposal: [BIP-852] Enable Aave Boosted GHO/USDC/USDT Gauge on Balancer v3 Avalanche
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This is a pool for GHO at Avalanche. It may drive fees up for the Protocol.
Proposal: [BIP-853] Gauge proposal for the siUSD-sUSDe pool
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support the addition of this gauge, as yield-bearing assets can increase protocol fees.
Proposal: [BIP-854] veBoost V2.1 (preseeded)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This update will enable more veBAL to participate in governance.
Proposal: [BIP-855] Enable Aave Boosted USD.AI/aGHO Gauge on Balancer v3 Arbitrum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support the addition of this gauge, as yield-bearing assets can increase protocol fees.
Proposal: [BIP-856] Grant Admin Permissions to Balancer v3 ReCLAMM v2 pools
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Permissions for ReCLAMM v2 pools.
Proposal: [BIP-857] Authorize Mimic Smart Vault on Optimism for Balancer V3
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support enabling automatic feed collection through Mimic Vault in the v3 instance.
Proposal: [BIP-858] Enable ExtraFi-exUSDC-exUSR Gauge on Base
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support the addition of this gauge, as interest-bearing assets can drive protocol fees up.
Proposal: [BIP-859] Change authorizations for Mimic Smart Vaults on Optimism for Balancer V3
Vote: Yes.
Reasoning: This proposal changes the authorizations to differentiate fess coming from v2 and v3.
Proposal: [BIP-860] Ecosystem ONsite Proposal Q4 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: ONsite events proved to be important for alignment and to boost productivity within the Balancer Ecosystem
Proposal: [BIP-861] Grant Permissions to the Balancer Registry Initializer
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Permission on new chains - operational vote.
Proposal: [BIP-862] Deploy Balancer v3 on HyperEVM
Vote: Yes, let’s do it
Reasoning: I support expanding to a new chain, and the new approach proposed.
Proposal: [BIP-863] Incorporation of a legal structure for Balancer Treasury and Finance Operations
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This structure is being used by other DAOs and provides a good balance between security and flexibility.
Proposal: [BIP-864] Enable RZR/wstETH 80/20 Gauge on Balancer v3 Ethereum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This pool will be the main source of liquidity for the token
Proposal: [BIP-865] Grant Emergency subDAO Missing v3 Pool Factory Disable Permissions
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Support. Operational vote to grant missing permissions.
Proposal: [BIP-866] Enable TREE/WETH 80/20 Pool Gauge on Balancer v3 Ethereum with a 5% cap
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This pool will be the main source of liquidity for the token
Proposal: [BIP-867] Grant Universal Gauge Management Permissions
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Support. Operational vote to grant permissions, while keeping activation with the DAO.
Proposal: [BIP-868] Enable EURe/USDC gauge on Arbitrum (uncapped)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We support stablecoin pools’ gauges, as they can drive up swap fees and trading volume.
Proposal: [BIP-869] Enable AAVE/WETH reCLAMM Gauge on Balancer v3 Ethereum and Arbitrum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Support. The first gauge for reCLAMM pools has the potential to showcase all its benefits.
Proposal: [BIP-870] Enable tAVAX-waAvaSAVAX Pool Gauge on Balancer v3 Avalanche with a 5% cap
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We support the addition of this gauge, as LST/LRTs can have a high trading volume, bringing more fees to Balancer.
Proposal: [AIP-76] 12-Month Ecosystem Fund Streamlining Proposal
Vote: For
Reasoning: I support this proposal, and the reasoning can be found here.
Proposal: [BIP-871] Balancer ↔ QuantAMM Protocol Fee Framework
Vote: Yes, let’s do it
Reasoning: I support this proposal. The fee framework is fair, keeps things consistent with BIP-734, and ensures both Balancer and QuantAMM are aligned. The 18-month review also gives flexibility to adjust if needed. This is a good step to strengthen the collaboration and support the growth of Blockchain Traded Funds on Balancer.
Proposal: [BIP-872] Enable FYNI/waBasUSDC 70/30 Pool Gauge on Balancer v3 (Base) with a 2% Cap
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: WIsupport enabling this gauge. The pool is positioned as the main liquidity venue for the token, and protocol incentives is expected to ensure sufficient depth and trading efficiency.
Proposal: [BIP-873] Balancer Ecosystem Roadmap Proposal and Funding
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This roadmap provides clarity, predictability, and cohesion across service providers. We believe it is essential for aligning Balancer’s efforts over the next year.
Proposal: [BIP-874] Urgent Proposal: Deploy Balancer v3 on Plasma
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Plasma represents a strategic ecosystem, and launching v3 there at inception positions Balancer as a foundational liquidity layer.
Proposal: [BIP-875] Implement EZKL Dynamic Fee Control for Balancer Pools
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Dynamic fees have already shown great results, with tests pointing to 10–30% better fee performance compared to static setups. Excited to see how the 3-month trial goes and if it can scale across more pools.
Proposal: [BIP-876] Enable Gauge for USDp/USDC Stable Pool with a 2% Cap (Base)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Parallel is a long term supporter of the Balancer ecosystem and the gauge will help boost USDp liquidity.
Proposal: [BIP-877] Kill Stale Gauges Q3 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: I support the removal of gauges that are not being used anymore..
Proposal: [BIP-878] Enable Gauge for USDp/frxUSD Stable Pool with a 2% Cap (Base)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Parallel is a long term supporter of the Balancer ecosystem and the gauge will help boost USDp liquidity.
Proposal: [BIP-879] Deploy Balancer v3 on X Layer - OKX chain
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Voting For — this is a smart, low-risk move that puts Balancer v3 early in a growing ecosystem alongside Aave. The phased rollout with clear checkpoints keeps things accountable, while the zero treasury cost and audited setup make it a safe way to test traction on X Layer. Good upside, minimal downside.
Proposal: [BIP-880] Enable Gauge for USDp/mevUSDC Stable Pool with a 2% cap (Avalanche)
Vote: Yes, let’s do it
Reasoning: I’m in favor of this proposal. I usually support stablecoin and yield-bearing pools that can strengthen Balancer’s ecosystem and drive sustainable revenue.
Proposal: [BIP-882] Transitioning Onchain Operations of the Balancer DAO to Balancer Onchain Limited
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This is the natural next step for moving Balancer’s execution into the proper onchain legal wrapper that was already set up.
Proposal: [BIP-883] Emergency Safe Governance Improvements Q4 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This makes the emergency layer easier to actually use in real incidents, while removing a permission that we don’t need. Faster response + less risk.
Proposal: [BIP-884] Wire Up BAL Token on Plasma Chain
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Plasma deployment hit the agreed milestones. Straightforward continuation of the rollout.
Proposal: [BIP-885] Permissions Update Request #7
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Standard permissions update to support new assets + voting delegation.
Proposal: [BIP-886] Enable Gauge for Nerite Surge eeUSDC-yUSND Stable Pool with 2% Cap on Arbitrum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: The protocol will incentivize the pool and I am supportive of increasing stable depth on Arbitrum.